Government
What Is a Constitutional Amendment and How Hard Is It to Pass One?
The United States Constitution is one of the world's oldest functioning written constitutions. It has endured for 235 years, governing a country that has transformed beyond any recognition by the Founders who wrote it.
It has been formally amended 27 times. For perspective: the UK has an uncodified constitution that evolves continuously through parliamentary legislation. India has amended its constitution over 100 times. The US's 27 amendments in 235 years reflects a framework so difficult to change that it survives partly through reinterpretation rather than formal revision.
The Intentionally High Bar
The amendment process was designed to be hard. The Founders had just lived through a period of constitutional instability and wanted the fundamental law to be resistant to temporary majorities or political passions.
The standard process: two-thirds of both houses of Congress must approve the proposed amendment, then three-fourths of state legislatures (currently 38 of 50) must ratify it.
Two-thirds of the House means 290 votes. Two-thirds of the Senate means 67 votes. Then 38 state legislatures must independently pass the amendment.
In an era where the two parties disagree on virtually everything and neither routinely holds two-thirds of either chamber, this threshold is nearly impossible for anything politically contested.
The Amendments That Changed America
The Constitutional amendments can be divided into clusters:
The Bill of Rights (1-10, 1791): Guarantees the freedoms from government that we most associate with American identity — speech, religion, press, assembly, arms, unreasonable search, due process, jury trial. Added to secure ratification of the original Constitution by skeptical states.
Civil War Amendments (13, 14, 15): Abolished slavery (13th), established equal protection and due process and citizenship for formerly enslaved people (14th), prohibited denial of voting rights based on race (15th). These three amendments transformed the Constitutional framework more than any others and continue to be the basis for most civil rights law.
Progressive Era Amendments (16, 17, 18, 19): Authorized the income tax (16th), established direct election of senators (17th, replacing legislative appointment), prohibited alcohol (18th — later repealed by the 21st), and gave women the right to vote (19th).
Voting Rights Amendments (23, 24, 26): Gave DC residents Electoral College votes (23rd), abolished poll taxes in federal elections (24th), lowered the voting age to 18 (26th).
The Failed Amendments
Hundreds of amendments have been proposed and never ratified. The most notable failures:
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA): Proposed in 1972, guaranteeing legal equality regardless of sex. Required ratification by 38 states. Reached 35 ratifying states quickly, then stalled. Nevada (2017), Illinois (2018), and Virginia (2020) eventually became states 36, 37, and 38 — but decades after Congress's ratification deadline. Whether the belated ratifications count is actively litigated.
DC Voting Rights Amendment: Proposed in 1978, would give DC voting representation in Congress. Ratified by only 16 states before the deadline lapsed.
Balanced Budget Amendment: Has passed both houses at various times but never with two-thirds majorities simultaneously and never reached state ratification. Proposed by Republicans in almost every Congress, used more as messaging than serious constitutional effort.
What the Current Debates Reveal
The most discussed constitutional changes today — overturning Citizens United through amendment, term limits, electoral college reform — all share one feature: they would require the cooperation of the institutions they are designed to reform.
The Supreme Court justices who issued Citizens United would need to be replaced before their successors would voluntarily overturn it through case law. The senators who benefit from the current system would need to vote for their own term limits. The states that benefit from the Electoral College (small states, battleground states) would need to ratify its elimination.
This is the fundamental constraint: constitutional change requires either bipartisan supermajority support or such overwhelming national consensus that partisan resistance becomes untenable.
In an era of high polarization, the 27th Amendment may be the last for a generation.