Foreign Policy
The Middle East Is Being Rewired — and America Is Losing the Remote
The Map Is Changing
The Middle East that the United States has managed — imperfectly but dominantly — for 80 years is being restructured. The old certainties are dissolving:
- Saudi Arabia and Iran, bitter adversaries, normalized relations brokered by China — not the US — in 2023.
- Gulf states are buying Chinese weapons systems alongside American ones.
- Arab states are joining the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a China-Russia-led security and political grouping.
- Multiple governments have endorsed China's Global Development Initiative over US-led alternatives.
This is not a crisis in the sense of armies moving. It is a slow redistribution of influence that will define the region's politics for decades.
How China Did What the US Could Not
China's 2023 brokering of the Saudi-Iran normalization deal was a diplomatic signal of the first order. For decades, the US had positioned itself as the indispensable power in the Gulf, guaranteeing Saudi security while managing the containment of Iran. China walked in, offered neutral mediation with no political preconditions, and delivered an outcome that had eluded American diplomacy.
The lesson Gulf states drew: China delivers. It does not lecture. It does not demand democratic reforms. It does not condition relationships on human rights compliance. For authoritarian governments, this is an attractive model.
The Gaza Effect
The US position on Gaza has alienated much of the Arab and Muslim world, and beyond. Supporting Israel's military operations unconditionally while providing minimal humanitarian pressure has generated enormous hostility across the Global South and deepened skepticism about US claims to rule-based, rights-respecting foreign policy.
The practical effect: countries that might have stayed closer to the US are accelerating their hedging strategies, seeking alternatives to dependence on Washington.
What the US Still Has
The US position in the Middle East is not a collapse — it retains significant military infrastructure, arms relationships with Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, and Israel, and the dollar's role as the primary currency in regional oil trade.
But the trajectory matters. These advantages compound in value when they are paired with diplomatic influence and ideological appeal. They depreciate when they stand alone, as instruments of transaction rather than partnership.
The Iran Nuclear Dimension
Iran's nuclear program continues advancing toward weapons capability while diplomatic engagement remains stalled. The Trump administration's maximum pressure strategy — which demonstrably accelerated Iran's nuclear program relative to the JCPOA period — is being replicated in Trump's second term.
A nuclear-capable Iran would fundamentally restructure the regional security architecture, potentially triggering Saudi nuclear ambitions and dramatically increasing the risk of conflict. This is a timeline problem that is advancing regardless of other regional realignments.
FAQ
What was the Saudi-Iran normalization deal? In March 2023, Saudi Arabia and Iran agreed to restore diplomatic relations, ending a formal rupture that had lasted since 2016. The deal was mediated by China and represented a significant diplomatic achievement for Beijing.
What are the Abraham Accords? The Abraham Accords (2020) were normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states — UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, Morocco — brokered by the Trump administration. They represented genuine diplomatic progress but did not resolve the Palestinian question.
Is Saudi Arabia moving away from the US? Saudi Arabia is diversifying its partnerships — buying Chinese weapons, engaging with China economically, maintaining military ties with the US — rather than replacing one patron with another. The era of Saudi-US exclusivity is over.